Whilst the true impact of quantum computers is anybody’s guess, there seems to be some consensus on the advantages offered by near-term devices in modeling more complex probability distributions. These distributions can be used to model complex particle interactions, e.g., in quantum chemistry, or, as we will see next, to train principled machine learning models – in this case, **binary Bayesian neural networks** – and enable fast adaptation to new learning tasks from few training examples.

## Setting

In our latest work, accepted for presentation at the IEEE MLSP, we are interested in training **Bayesian binary neural networks**, i.e., classical neural networks with stochastic binary weights, in a sample-efficient manner by means of meta-learning, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The key idea of this work is to model the distribution of the binary weights via a **Born machine**, i.e., via a probabilistic parametric quantum circuit (PQC), due to the capacity of PQCs to efficiently implement complex probability distributions [1]-[4]. We propose a novel method that integrates **meta-learning** with the gradient-based optimization of quantum Born machines [3], with the aim of speeding up adaptation to new learning tasks from few examples.

## Born Machines

A Born machine produces random binary strings , where denotes the total number of model parameters, by measuring the output of a PQC defined by parameters .

As illustrated in Fig. 2, the PQC takes the initial state of *n* qubits as an input, and operates on it via a sequence of unitary gates described by a unitary matrix . This operation outputs the final quantum state

which is measured in the computational basis to produce a random binary string . Note that each basis vector of the computational basis corresponds to one of all the possible *2^n* patterns of model parameters .

The PQC can be implemented using a **hardware-efficient ansatz** [2], in which a layer of one-qubit unitary gates, parametrized by vector , is followed by a layer of fixed, entangling, two-qubit gates. This pattern can be repeated any number of times, building a progressively deeper circuit. Another option is using the **mean-field ansatz** that does not use entangling gates, and only relies on one-qubit gates.

By Born’s rule (hence the name of the circuit), the probability distribution of the output model parameter vector is given by

Importantly, Born machines only provide samples, while the actual distribution above can only be estimated by averaging multiple measurements of the PQC’s outputs. Therefore, Born machines model **implicit distributions,** and only define a stochastic procedure that directly generates samples.

## Some Results

Fig. 3 illustrate the results in terms of the prediction root mean squared error (RMSE) as a function of the number of meta-training iterations. By comparison with conventional per-task learning, the figure illustrates the capacity of both joint learning and meta-learning to transfer knowledge from the meta-training to the meta-test task, with hardware-efficient (HE) and mean-field (MF) quantum meta-learning clearly outperforming joint learning. For example, HE meta-learning requires around *150* meta-training iterations to achieve the same RMSE ideal per-task training, whilst joint-learning requires more than *200* to achieve comparable performance. The HE ansatz performs best, due to the use of entangling unitaries; however, the MF ansatz approaches the minimal RMSE after *230* iterations. The classical solution based on MF Bernoulli does not achieve lower RMSE than the quantum-aided meta-learning schemes, even with joint learning.

Please see the paper for a more detailed exposition, available here.

## References

[1] Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J.C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F.G., Buell, D.A., et al.: Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574(7779), 505–510 (2019)

[2] Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature 549(7671), 242–246 (2017)

[3] Liu, J.G., Wang, L.: Differentiable learning of quantum circuit Born machines. Physical Review A 98(6), 062324 (2018)

[4] Sweke, R., Seifert, J.P., Hangleiter, D., Eisert, J.: On the quantum versus classical learnability of discrete distributions. Quantum 5, 417 (2021)

## Leave a Reply