Since 2016, the Polish parliament has introduced several new laws that challenge the very foundation of the Polish judicial system, particularly the Polish Supreme Court. These reforms not only represent a further step of the governing Law and Justice Party (PiS) in reducing the independence of the country’s judiciary, but they also pose a threat to one of the European Union’s most fundamental principles: The rule of law. Against this background, this paper shortly outlines the legal instruments available under EU law for securing the rule of law, discusses possible weaknesses of these measures and presents alternative approaches to redress existing violations.
Serena Natile – Postdoctoral Researcher at King’s College London and Associate Lecturer at Kent Law School, University of Kent
Just before the holiday break, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in its first ruling on the gig economy decided that the global digitally-enabled taxi company, Uber, is a transportation and not an information service and can be regulated by Member States (MS). This judgement has raised important questions regarding the regulation and social implications of digital platforms according to EU law and beyond. While the ECJ’s decision created more grounds to protect workers’ rights in the sharing economy and contributed to the debate on the allocation of EU/MS competences within the digital domain, it also offers useful insights to reflect on the social role of digital platforms more generally.
2017 has been an ‘intense’ year for EU law, dense of political events and historical moments. For this reason, instead of choosing our favourite music album or film of the year, the goliardic vein of our editors hereby presents the highlights of our “favourite” EU law moments of 2017…
The KSLR EU Law Blog hereby invites you to submit abstracts for blog posts on
any area of EU law
(including but not limited to judicial protection, internal market, external relations, financial regulation, data-protection, environmental policies).
Submissions covering any of the following topics are particularly welcome:
- The future of the EU: reflections and reforms
- The external dimension of EU policies
- The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and its application at EU and national level
- Protecting and enhancing the rule of law in the EU
- Issues of law or policy of Member States with relevance for the EU
We also invite submissions on:
- Coverage of EU law-related events
- Reviews of recently published EU law-related books as well as
- Recent developments of EU case law
We are looking for 800 – 2000 words articles.
Please refer to our style guidelines.
Please send abstracts or full articles to firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com by 20 February 2018.
We look forward to hearing from you!
The KSLR EU Law Blog Editorial Team
Martina Benackova – 3rd year LLB student at UCL
In the Ajos case, the Supreme Court of Denmark (SCDK) referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) two questions relating to the compatibility of paragraph 2a(3) of the Danish Salaried Employees Act with Directive 2000/78/EC, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation.
Despite the clear instructions received from the ECJ, the SCDK refused to set aside the conflicting provision of national law, giving precedence to national law over EU law instead.
This paper shortly summarises the facts of the case and the reasoning of the SCDK, discussing them in the framework of the Treaty principles of supremacy of EU law and loyal cooperation. It then maintains that the decision of the SCDK in Ajos is an illustration of judicial disobedience of a national Court vis-à-vis the ECJ, which threatens the doctrine of the primacy of EU law as established by the European Court in the landmark decision Costa v ENEL.