Author: Tasmin Head (Page 1 of 2)

Leadership Skills for Researchers: Why They Matter and How to Build Them

By King’s Careers & Employability, Careers Consultants for Researchers Team

Leadership isn’t just for people with “manager” in their job title – it’s a vital capability for anyone who wants to make their ideas a reality. For researchers, leadership is about influence, direction, and the ability to bring people and projects together to achieve impact, whether this is in or beyond academia. It also clearly demonstrates the ability to take the initiative, be innovative, take responsibility and influence others. At the end of this article we have provided a few opportunities to build your leadership skills at King’s.

Why develop leadership skills?

Research increasingly depends on collaboration, whether in interdisciplinary projects, supervising students, coordinating with industry or policy partners and to secure research funding. Strong leadership helps you motivate others, make sound decisions, and communicate a clear vision – qualities that shape not only successful research teams but also resilient, innovative careers more broadly.

In many fellowship applications this is reflected in the narrative CV under the heading that is usually something like ‘Development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships’ where you can demonstrate your research leadership capability through leading a team, collaborators, partnerships and/or networks.

Leadership is one of the most frequently mentioned skills in UK job adverts and came under the broader cluster of ‘strategic management and governance’ as found by research led by Imperial that analysed over 65 million UK job adverts. The World Economic Forum lists leadership and social influence among the fastest-growing skills across all sectors which is no surprise when you consider that this is probably the most important skill for employees dealing with and supporting others with change. Whether you aim for a lectureship, a policy post, or an R&D role in industry, developing leadership skills makes you more adaptable and employable.

What’s the benefit?

Leadership skills translate directly into effectiveness at work: you’ll manage time and resources better, foster inclusive collaboration, and be able to guide teams through uncertainty – a daily reality in the current workplace. They also enhance your confidence in influencing upwards (for example, when negotiating project scope or impact) and sideways (when coordinating across disciplines or institutions).

Crucially, leadership development supports wellbeing. Knowing how to delegate, give feedback, and handle conflict has been linked to reducing burnout and creating healthier research and work cultures.

How can I develop leadership skills?

  • Start small: Lead a project meeting, coordinate a reading group, or supervise an undergraduate project. Every opportunity to guide others builds experience.
  • Seek feedback: Ask colleagues and supervisors for feedback on your communication and decision-making style.
  • Learn formally: King’s offers short courses including research leadership and project management and you also have access to LinkedIn Learning
  • Observe and reflect: Notice how effective leaders around you handle challenges and motivation.
  • Look beyond academia: Volunteering, community projects, meaningful work experience opportunities and entrepreneurship all provide ways to practise leadership.

Leadership is often one of the skills that is most highly rated by academia and industry for your future roles yet it is seldom formally taught during a PhD. Our recent ‘Careers in your Ears’ podcast episode with Dr. Matthew Betts talks about exactly this and recommends being proactive and speaking to your supervisors or other academics about the kind of leadership skills that are required.

Acquiring leadership skills is something you can do to prepare for your next career stage and you may also discover new interests and connections along the way.

Leadership development opportunities at King’s include:

  • King’s Careers & Employability’s Insights Programme: three week virtual consultancy project
  • King’s Entrepreneurship Institute: training and development opportunities for doctoral researchers
  • King’s Doctoral College: variety of training opportunities including “The Leading Researcher: What is your leadership style and how can you enhance your influence?” Friday 12 December, 09:30-12:45, online – Visit SkillsForge (PGR323) to find out more and to book your place.
  • King’s Doctoral College Community Wellbeing Fund: bid for funding and lead your own project to build your doctoral community
  • KDSA: There are a couple of roles remaining for doctoral representatives on the King’s Doctoral Student Association including: part-time PGRs, healthcare professionals, NMES faculty, KBS faculty, Guys campus, Francis Crick. Email kdsa@kclsu.org if interested.

Find out more about our careers support for researchers at King’s including our podcast Careers in Your Ears, one-to-one appointments, online resources and a variety of workshops and events.

King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize Winners 2025

King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize Winners 2025

Each year the King’s Doctoral College gives out a limited number of awards to celebrate truly outstanding research and theses completed by King’s doctoral students.

The King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize Winners receive their awards at their graduation ceremony and also receive a £250 prize.

The Winners of the Second Round are:

Luke Vano, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience

“Multimodal Imaging Links Elevated Striatal Dopamine Synthesis in Schizophrenia with High Neuromelanin and Brain Iron Deficiency.”

Luke Vano

Luke Vano

I am deeply honoured to have been awarded a King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize. I joined the Maudsley Psychiatry Training Programme with the ambition of contributing to cutting-edge research. After many unanswered emails to prospective supervisors, I began to think it might not be possible—until I attended a lecture by Oliver Howes on the biological basis of schizophrenia. Captivated by his insights, I reached out, and he responded. Since then, Oliver has been an exceptional mentor, providing constant support and guidance. I am also grateful to Ian Everall, whose encouragement and inspiration have been invaluable throughout my research journey.

My PhD investigated how changes in brain iron and neuromelanin—a product of dopamine metabolism—relate to dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia. Using MRI and PET imaging, I provided evidence that patients with schizophrenia have higher neuromelanin levels but lower brain iron compared to healthy controls, and that these changes are linked to elevated dopamine synthesis. The findings suggest that disruptions in iron homeostasis and neuromelanin production contribute to striatal hyperdopaminergia in schizophrenia—a hallmark of the disorder. Investigating the origin of these abnormalities may offer new biomarkers and treatment targets.

The analysis pipelines developed for this thesis are rooted on the pioneering work of Robert McCutcheon. His ability to demystify the most complex topics has often left me in awe. I feel incredibly fortunate to have had him as a supervisor. I am also indebted to Jan Sedlacik, Stephen Kaar, Grazia Rutigliano, and Mattia Veronese for their guidance and for making my time in research so enjoyable.

I am currently continuing my research at King’s as a postdoctoral researcher, alongside continuing my psychiatry training. 

Find out more about Luke’s postdoctoral research on LinkedIn.

Yong Li, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine

“Novel methods for estimating (poly)phenol consumption: relationship with cardiometabolic health.”

Yong Li

Yong Li

It is with immense pride and gratitude that I accept the King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize. My academic journey began in China with a BSc in Food Quality and Safety at Nanjing Agricultural University, followed by an MSc in Nutrition and Food Hygiene at Peking University, where I graduated among the top of the department and developed a strong foundation in public health nutrition, epidemiology, and experimental research. I also actively engaged in public health outreach—founding a OneHealth student society, coordinating cross-national academic workshops, and participating in HIV prevention campaigns, which cultivated my commitment to translating scientific insight into public benefit. 

During my PhD at King’s, I pioneered novel methodological approaches to assess (poly)phenol intake and its role in cardiometabolic health. I developed the King’s College London (Poly)phenol Food Frequency Questionnaire, a (poly)phenol-rich dietary score, and a corresponding metabolic signature, which were all applied to the TwinsUK cohort (n = 3110). This work revealed significant inverse associations between adherence to (poly)phenol-rich diets and cardiovascular risk scores, contributing meaningful tools to nutritional epidemiology. The work led to 13 publications with 10 as first author (including 2 under-review) in leading international journals, along with 18 abstracts presented and 7 oral presentations at prestigious international conferences, and five awards, competitive travel and registration grants. I was also selected as a finalist in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences category at STEM for BRITAIN 2024, where I presented my research to MPs at the Houses of Parliament, which allowed me to discuss the public health relevance and methodological contributions of my work directly with policymakers. 

Moving forward, I will continue my academic path and further apply the tools developed during my PhD. I also look forward to completing several publications and pursuing new collaborations in nutrition and public health. 

Thanks again for this incredible recognition.

You can discover more about Yong Li’s work on LinkedIn and Twitter: @YongLi35986394

Guiming Han, King’s Business School

“Shocks, Budget Stickiness, and Network Effects in Retail Investor Decision-Making.

Guiming Han

Guiming Han

I am honoured to have received the 2024/25 King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize. I am deeply grateful to my supervisors, Professor Alex Preda and Dr Filippos Papakonstantinou, as well as my colleagues and friends at King’s, for their guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral journey. 

Before starting my PhD, I graduated with distinction in MSc Corporate Finance at King’s Business School and gained professional experience in investment analysis and project management in Shanghai. These experiences provided a strong foundation in both practice and theory, motivating me to return to King’s to pursue a doctorate in Finance. 

My thesis consists of three essays in empirical finance that explore how trader behaviour shapes investment decisions and outcomes. The first investigates how risk preferences shift after trading shocks, uncovering asymmetric behavioural responses between small and large shocks. The second introduces the concept of budget stickiness, showing that adherence to pre-set budgets fosters more disciplined trading and better performance. The third examines status competition in online social trading platforms, highlighting how network initiation informally regulates competition. Collectively, the thesis advances our understanding of risk, financial personality traits, and social dynamics in markets. 

Looking ahead, I plan to continue an academic career, extending my research on behavioural finance, networks, and the digital economy, with the aim of contributing to both scholarly debates and policy-relevant insights. 

If you’d like to find out more about Guiming’s current research, then please check out his LinkedIn page. 

Eleanor Gluck, Faculty of Arts & Humanities

“Relational and Strange: A Queer Reading of Aury, Bataille and Sade in Translation.”

Eleanor Gluck

Eleanor Gluck

Following my undergraduate degree at the University of Glasgow, having spent a year living and working in Toulouse, I returned to South Wales, where I grew up, to study for a Masters in Translation at the University of Swansea. This was made possible thanks to a grant and funding from the Welsh government. Though the MA was concerned primarily with the practicalities of technical translation, I grew increasingly interested in the theoretical and practical delicacies of translating literature, specifically as it involves the re-writing of gender, sexuality, and sex.  

The work of William Spurlin was a major source of inspiration, motivating the pursuit of a PhD. It was, then, for me, a full circle moment to have the opportunity not only to meet William but have him be one of my examiners. The viva turned out to be – thanks to William and Elliott Evans (who, as it turns out, in another full circle moment, went to the same comprehensive school in South Wales as me) – a humbling and joyous experience.  

Over the course of my PhD, I became a mother to my daughter Mabli. I have been supported immeasurably over the course of it by my partner Tom, as well as friends, family, and, especially, our daughter’s childminders. Finally, in the first place, this PhD would never have been remotely possible without my supervisor Ros Murray who championed it from the start and was a steadfast source of courage, inspiration, and friendship. I left every meeting with Ros buoyed.  

Since completing my PhD I have been working on getting my thesis published as a monograph, while, until recently, being a full-time mum. I am not entirely sure what the future holds but I am very grateful to have been able to complete this PhD thanks to funding from LAHP. To receive this award is surreal, and I am very grateful.  

You can connect with Eleanor on LinkedIn

Uxio Hermida Nunes, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine

“Computational Approaches to Unveil the Hidden Fetal Arch Shape and Flow Signatures in Coarctation of the Aorta.”

Uxio Hermida Nunes

Uxio Hermida Nunes

I completed my BSc in Biomedical Engineering at Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) in Barcelona, where I first became interested in cardiac modelling and how computational simulations can help us better understand cardiac disease. During my final year, I joined Philips Research Paris for an internship, working on simulations of cardiac valves using numerical methods. I then moved to London for an MSc in Healthcare Technologies. After a successful MSc project with Professor Pablo Lamata, I began my PhD journey under the supervision of Professor Lamata and Dr Adelaide De Vecchi.

My doctoral research focused on developing computational approaches to study fetal aortic arch morphology and haemodynamics in cases of coarctation of the aorta using novel fetal magnetic resonance imaging. This work was made possible through a close collaboration with the clinical team at St. Thomas’ Hospital (Dr Milou Van Poppel, Dr David Lloyd and Dr Kuberan Pushparajah). Working within this multidisciplinary environment of engineers and clinicians was deeply rewarding and reinforced my belief in the power of collaboration for clinical impact.

Throughout my PhD, I presented my work at international conferences, published in journals, and was nominated as Best Postgraduate Researcher by the School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences. I also represented King’s at the STEM4Britain competition at the UK Parliament and won the HS-DTC Best Scientific Image Award.

After completing my PhD, I moved to Paris to join Dassault Systèmes as a Research Engineer in the MEDITWIN project, developing digital twin technologies for paediatric cardiology. This role allows me to continue pursuing my passion for computational modelling and digital twins in paediatric and fetal cardiology.

Receiving the King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize is an honour and a meaningful recognition of this journey. I’m deeply grateful to my supervisors, Professor Pablo Lamata and Dr Adelaide De Vecchi, for their guidance, encouragement, and for fostering such a collaborative and inspiring research environment.

Check out Uxio’s research profile on Google Scholar and connect on LinkedIn.

Ilaria Di Dedda, Faculty of Natural, Mathematical & Engineering Sciences

“Type A symplectic Auslander-Reiten theory”

Ilaria Di Dedda

I am honoured to have been awarded one of the King’s Outstanding Thesis Prizes. I am grateful to my supervisors Professor Yankı Lekili and Professor Konni Rietsch, and to my peers and colleagues for their steady support throughout my PhD. I would also like to thank my examiners and the panel for this recognition.

I came to King’s to study for my MSc in Mathematics, after completing a BSc at the Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy. I enjoyed my course, but above everything I loved working on my MSc Final Project, which gave me a first taste of what research in Maths looked like, and which pushed me to pursue a PhD. My PhD thesis studies interactions between symplectic geometry and representation theory, two fertile areas of Mathematics, concerned with the study of both abstract and physical objects. Each area has its own individual set of problems and open questions, which researchers in the respective fields tackle every day, but it is often thanks to these unexpected connections that we are able to find new answers to them.

During my PhD, I have presented my research at international conferences and seminars, my work has been accepted for publication, I was the co-winner of the third year “PGR research competition” prize (2023), and I have been nominated for an Outstanding Teaching Assistant (2022) and a King’s Education Award (2023). I am especially pleased to be receiving this Prize after being awarded the equivalent one for my MSc Project in 2019, also under the supervision of Professor Lekili, which makes me feel like my experience at King’s has come full circle.

I am now fortunate to have a postdoc position at the University of Edinburgh, where I am looking forward to work on new research problems.

You can read more on Ilaria’s Google Page.

Victoria Charlton, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy

“To what extent can NICE defend its claim to be an ethical priority setter?”

Victoria Charlton

Victoria Charlton

I am honoured to receive a King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize. I would like to sincerely thank my examiners, supervisors, and the panel for this recognition.

My decision to do a PhD came as a surprise to many – not least me – as at the time I’d been working for several years in science policy, first as a Specialist to the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee and later as Head of Policy at the Academy of Medical Sciences. (In my opinion, the best job in the world). But having decided to start a family, my hormone-addled brain thought that part-time doctoral study would be the perfect way to balance flexible working with looking after young children. Nine years on, that decision has paid off and this wonderful prize is further endorsement of a journey that hasn’t always been easy.

I’ve always been fascinated by ethics and was interested in the role that ethical considerations play in shaping – or failing to shape – public policy. And nowhere are the ethical implications of policy decisions more salient than in the arena of healthcare priority-setting. My thesis combines empirical research with ethical analysis to explore the role that normative (that is, value-based) commitments play in shaping the priority-setting decisions reached by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). It finds that though many of the values underpinning NICE’s formal approach are highly coherent and support NICE’s main goal of promoting population health, coherence is sometimes lost in the translation of this approach into real-world decision-making. In a nutshell, though NICE claims to act ethically in making decisions about which new drugs NHS patients should be able to access, my research suggests that this claim cannot be robustly defended.

Since completing my PhD, I have taken some time to consider what comes next. The challenge of combining work with childcare does not, as it turns out, end once the kids are in school so my current plan is to continue working in academia part-time while also embarking on other pursuits. As such, I have recently taken up a position as a Visiting Research Fellow at LSE Health while continuing to publish and teach regularly at Imperial College London – a portfolio of roles that, in general, means that I’m still available for pick-up at 3.30pm.

Read more about Victoria’s research on her King’s Profile.

Francesca Ideo, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences

“Apical periodontitis and immune system:Influence of patient’s immunomodulation on endodontic disease.”
Francesca Ideo

Francesca Ideo

It was truly an honour to be a student at King’s College London.

I was an off-site PhD student, as I live in Cagliari, a beautiful city in Sardinia, in the south of Italy. 

My career in dentistry began with Dental degree in 2013 at the Universitiy of Cagliari, Italy, where I also completed a master’s degree in Clinical and Surgical Endodontics in 2016. 

My research stemmed from my long-standing work at the University Hospital of Cagliari. Over the years, I have been involved there first as a student, then as a clinical trainer, and now as a health professional. Being in close contact with patients affected by various conditions and under different treatments helped me realise how deeply systemic and oral health are interconnected. This awareness inspired the topic of my PhD thesis

I mostly focused on finding a connection between autoimmune-diseases and medications taken by the patients to treat these conditions (immune-modulators and immnune-suppressant drugs) and the prevalence and healing of apical periodontitis, one of the most frequent oral disease in the world. 

Throughout my PhD, I received support and guidance from Professor Francesco Mannocci and Professor Elisabetta Cotti, to whom I owe my heartfelt gratitude.

During this time, I had the pleasure of presenting my project several times at international conferences, where I met many researchers who showed great interest in my work, and I received an award for the best clinical research from the Journal of Endodontics in 2023.

Pursuing this  PhD gave me the opportunity to deepen my knowledge and to work with patients who needed care with greater understanding and scientific awareness.

Now that I have completed my PhD, I am working as an adjunct professor at the University of Cagliari, and I sincerely hope to maintain a strong connection with King’s College.

Studying there has been one of the most enriching and inspiring experiences of my life.

Find out more about Francesca’s research on ResearchGate.

Hannah Scott, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care

Hannah Scott

Hannah Scott

“Developing an implementation plan with theoretically-informed strategies for integration of the Children’s Palliative care Outcome Scale into routine paediatric palliative care.”

I am delighted to have received an Outstanding Thesis Prize. I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Richard Harding, Dr Claire Ellis-Smith, and Dr Debbie Braybrook for their support throughout the process, my examiners, Professor Ulrika Kreicbergs and Professor Bernie Carter for nominating me for this award, and to the NHIR ARC South London for funding my PhD.

I started working on the Children’s Palliative care Outcome Scale (C-POS) study as a research assistant in 2020 as my first full-time research job after having completed an MSc in Social Policy and Social Research (University College London) and BA(Hons) Children, Young People, and Families (York St John University). I knew at this point I wanted to pursue a career in research and at some point, do a PhD. Within my first year, Professor Richard Harding identified an NIHR ARC South London studentship and encouraged me to apply to undertake a PhD as part of the wider study. 

For my PhD, I developed an implementation plan that will be able to support the integration of C-POS into routine hospital-based care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. I was also able to apply for a Seedcorn grant from the Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery, and Palliative Care to develop short videos for parents  and professionals to communicate the anticipated benefits of the tool and further support future implementation.

I also had the opportunity to present my work at several international conferences, including the European Association for Palliative Care 12th World Congress, where my poster on ‘Challenges and incentives for integrating person-centred outcome measures into routine paediatric palliative care: health, social care, and commissioner perspectives’ won an award for one of five best posters in category.

Since completing my PhD, I have been working as a research associate, at Queen Mary University of London, on studies focused on the impact of science communication events for families affected by multiple sclerosis and understanding what matters most to children with dystonia and their families.

Find out more Hannah’s research via ORCiD, LinkedIn, BlueSky and Twitter

Joanne McDermid, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience

“Randomised Controlled Trial of the iWHELD Programme: A Novel Digital Non-Pharmacological Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in People Living with Dementia in Care Homes.”

Joanne McDermid

Joanne McDermid

I’m so happy and honoured to have received the King’s Outstanding Thesis Prize. Completing my PhD part-time at King’s College London was an incredible journey, and I’m thrilled to have my work recognised in this way.

My research focused on developing and evaluating a novel digital training programme to improve quality of life for people living with dementia in care homes. This included leading two randomised controlled trials, one involving over 600 participants and delivered during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. The programme demonstrated significant impact in enhancing wellbeing and reducing the use of psychotropic medication.

The research resulted in multiple peer-reviewed publications, including in a leading dementia journal, and was recommended for national implementation in an Alzheimer’s Society report to government. I also secured postdoctoral funding to support further real-world evaluation.

Alongside my academic journey, I navigated two periods of maternity leave, including a twin pregnancy, and have been raising my three little girls alongside completing the PhD. It was a demanding but deeply rewarding experience that taught me a great deal about resilience, staying focussed on my purpose, and holding onto a long-term vision. 

Since completing my doctorate, I’ve continued in applied dementia research, with a growing focus on real world implementation and closing the gap between evidence-based research and everyday practice. I’m particularly interested in how we create digital, human-centred tools that are genuinely built for real life and real challenges, and exploring how emerging technologies, such as AI, can enhance care and deliver meaningful support at scale, without losing what matters most: human connection.

About the prize

The prizes are nominated by the external examiners and are judged by a panel consisting of the College’s Director of Research Talent and the Chair of the Research Degrees Examinations Board. There are two rounds, in January and June, and these are the winners from the second round.

Top 10s – Getting the best from supervision

 

Nigel Eady Director of Research Talent

Nigel Eady, Director of Research Talent.

Far and away the most important relationship during your PhD is with your primary supervisor.

 

Many successful academics were launched into their careers by a fantastic supervisor. However, it’s not a given that everything runs smoothly.

We know how important good supervision is and are part of a UK-wide project to develop the very best continuing professional development for research supervisors.

Having worked with numerous PhD students and supervisors in various guises since I finished my own PhD in 2003/4, here are my top 10 tips for getting the best from your supervisory relationship.

1. Discuss expectations and agree ways of working early on

It’s not a given that a student and supervisor’s expectations of how to work effectively together will match. You might be fortunate, but don’t make assumptions. Ideally in your first few supervisory meetings you should discuss how you’re going to work together and what you can expect of each other.

Your faculty should have a template document to guide you and your supervisor in this conversation. You can also download our template to get you started.  If you didn’t have that conversation at the start, don’t worry, have it now!

2. Review ways of working regularly

It’s also important to revisit the expectations conversation every now and then. As you progress in your PhD, your needs will change and the support your supervisor provides will likely change too. So revisit that conversation.

3. Remember your supervisor isn’t perfect!

It sounds obvious, but some students definitely have an unrealistic view of their supervisor. Remember they are human and likely have many other draws on their time, whether other students or other responsibilities, at work and at home. Be careful of slipping into bad habits – submitting work at the last minute and expecting a speedy response, for example.

4. Ask for help when you need it

Most PhD students are highly successful, hard-working people, used to getting top grades. Seriously! That’s you! As such, a PhD can be a challenge. You’re (suddenly) expected to be self-directed and you may come up against all sorts of issues. Your ideas are critiqued and pulled apart. Seemingly fruitful avenues of enquiry turn out to be dead ends. Experiments don’t work, archives don’t yield the information and insights you hoped for, fieldwork takes twice as long to plan as you’d imagined! Something happens in your personal life. You’ll need help. It’s normal.

5. If there are problems then raise them, don’t let them fester

Just ask for help sooner rather than later! There’s no shame in it. You’ll probably address the problems more quickly if you nip them in the bud. We’ve all been there, I can assure you.

There are lots of routes you can go depending on the issue:

  • Is there a PGR officer in your dept? Someone in Professional Services who can help with practice things.
  • Maybe you need to speak to your academic PGR Coordinator.
  • There may be confidential advisors or personal tutors, depending on your faculty.
  • There is also the Associate Dean for Doctoral Studies, your faculty PGR lead.
  • And there is lots of support through Student Services – for mental health and wellbeing, counselling, money & housing advice and more
  • Our PGR Wellbeing Hub has all the links and information com/pgrwh

6. Make use of your second supervisor

I hope you know who your second supervisor is! There’s no one shape for what a second supervisor can offer. Just make use of them. Have regular meetings even if they’re not that frequent. They might be a sounding board for new ideas. They might have a specific skill/interest/expertise that will enrich your research/thesis. They might be very experienced and therefore be a fount of knowledge or provide access to networks. Like I say, there’s no one type.

7. Manage upwards

If you’re not getting what you need from your supervisor then you may need to be more assertive. We can help you with that… book for our workshop

Getting the Best from your Supervisor (PGR324)

This course will help you to understand your supervisor’s perspective and expectations and will highlight areas for autonomy and supervision throughout a doctoral journey. Learn how to be assertive and persuasive in the way that you communicate with your supervisors to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.

8. Celebrate your supervisor if they’re doing a good job!

A lot of supervisors put a lot of time and energy into supervision. If that’s your supervisor then I can assure you that a kind word of thanks goes a long way.

If your supervisor really is excellent then you might like to nominate them for one of our Supervisory Excellence Awards.

Supervisor Excellence Award Winners standing on the stairs in Strand Building.

Supervisory Excellence Award Winners 2022/23

9. Remember it’s your PhD!

I’m probably speaking more to scientists and lab-based researchers here but fundamentally the PhD is yours! In some disciplines your supervisor may play a very close guiding role, especially the start, but don’t let that lull you into a false sense of dependence. You will have to defend your thesis in the final exam. So don’t be afraid to try things you think are important and to discuss options robustly with your supervisor(s). As you progress in your research you should be becoming an expert, so don’t give way to critique too quickly.

In other disciplines, you may be only too aware that it’s your PhD! So…

10. Draw on as many sources of wisdom and support as you can

It can be easy to get stuck in a rut. So don’t!

Seek out other sources of support, find a mentor or two. Attend seminars in other related departments. Approach other researchers and academics. Make the most of being at a comprehensive research-intensive institution. Time spent thinking about bigger issues, the broader research context is rarely wasted and may yield information, stimulate new ideas and help you move forward.

I wish you all the very best in your doctoral research.

Nigel Eady
Director of Research Talent

Top 10s – Who’s on your team?

Nigel Eady Director of Research Talent

Nigel Eady, Director of Research Talent.

Who are the people who are helping you to be successful? Are you making the most of that support? Is there more support you could draw on?

 

 

I’ve been watching a lot of the Athletics recently. My father loved running and whilst he wasn’t ever close to being national standard, he had friends who were pretty close to it. When I was young, the TV would always be on if there was a big event happening, especially the Olympics or European Championships.

I think athletics is a pretty good analogy for the journey of the PhD.

We tend to think of athletics as an individual sport, but it struck me how many of the athletes talked about all the other people who had enabled them to be successful – family, friends, coaches, other current athletes, former athletes, the list went on.

When it comes down to it, like the athlete in the championship on the race track, there’s only one person who writes the thesis and goes through the oral exam.

Yet also like the athlete, to be really successful, you need a whole host of people supporting you and cheering you on.

Thirty or more years ago, a PhD was a solitary pursuit. You did everything on your own, with just the guidance of your solitary supervisor. However those days should be long gone. It’s well recognised that effective training of inexperienced researchers requires much more than one person! So who is on your team? Every athlete draws on a slightly different group of people, or perhaps draws on some people more than others.

Here is a Top 10 of people whom you might draw on. There’s no ‘one size fits all’. However, I’d dare to suggest if you’re not making use of most of these possible supporters, then you’re giving yourself an unnecessary handicap!

1. Supervisor

Certainly the most crucial person in your team. How well are you working together? When I’m discussing challenges with doctoral researchers, it’s often the case that there are mismatches in expectations between student and supervisor. Maybe you discussed expectations when you started your research degree but things change. If you’re in the final phases of the PhD and writing up, you’re likely entering new territory in your relationship. What can you expect from your supervisor then? What do you think you need? Have you had a proper conversation about writing the thesis or is it all based on assumption, what you’ve heard from others? Use your time effectively by having a clear discussion with your supervisor about what you think you need and what they can offer you. And this is true throughout the PhD.

2. Second supervisor

Hopefully you know who your second supervisor is! How often do you meet them? What do you discuss? Every second supervisor will be a bit different. Maybe yours brings a particular interest or skill to the table. Maybe their research interests are related but in a somewhat different area. What do you need from them? Maybe it’s just general discussions about how to tackle the PhD. Do you know their strengths? What can you learn from them? How can they add either to your research or your skills?

3. Other academic colleagues, researchers/staff at different levels

Sometimes you just need someone who gets the academic and research environment but isn’t connected to your project. Someone else in your department or even in another School or Faculty. Maybe you share an interest outside your research. Maybe you’ve had an interesting conversation in a dept seminar and they seemed like someone you’d get on with. It’s great to have a few people around you who understand your world and can offer advice, contacts or experience.

4. Mentors

Do you have a mentor? There are many ways to get a mentor – formal schemes and informal approaches. A mentor can be invaluable for navigating complex environments or for considering what next. Having run mentoring schemes in the past, I think you get the most value from a mentor when you, as a mentee, are in the driving seat, making sure the mentoring is providing what you need.

5. Peers

I hope you have a few people around you who know exactly what you’re going through now. You may be fortunate and have lab colleagues or peers in your dept who share an office with you. Downloading your woes to someone who understands can definitely be cathartic (as long as you promise to be that person for them when they need you!)

6. Staff who support doctoral students – academics and professional services

You should have a PGR Coordinator or equivalent in your department, whose role is to support and advise doctoral researchers. You may also have PS staff who support PhDs. They may be the people you ask very basic questions about the PhD and the process, they may be the ones who can guide you if problems arise, whether complex ones or very simple ones.

7. One-to-one expert support

Did you know you can meet one-to-one with a careers consultant to discuss any career related issue or question? You might have no idea what to do next or what you want to do? They’ll help you to start working that out. You might need advice on a job application or an interview. You can also meet one-to-one with a professional writer to help you with your writing. Maybe you’re struggling to get words on paper. Maybe you’ve got the words down but you’re struggling for clarity or to communicate your argument.

8. Support services

In a similar vein, there is lots of support at King’s – start with Student Services (housing, money and more), who will point you to the relevant team. Ask for help before it all gets too much.

9. Friends

Sometimes you just need someone to tell you to forget your research for a few hours or a weekend and do something completely different. As a friend of mine says, “Have breaks, make breakthroughs!”

10. Family

I know not everyone is close to their family, but if you are, they are clearly a great resource. Perhaps your family are far away? If so, why not plan ahead – put a home visit in the diary, something to look forward to.

Like I say, different people need different help at different times. Just don’t suffer in silence!

Nigel Eady
Director of Research Talent

Announcing the winners of the first King’s Research Mentoring and Support awards

A group photo of the three winners of the Research Mentoring and Support winners; Dr Deborah Robson, Dr Melissa Washington and Sharwari Verma

Mentoring & Support Prize Winners 2023; Dr Deborah Robson, Dr Melissa Washington-Nortey and Sharwari Verma

We are pleased to announce the winners of the very first King’s Research Mentoring and Support awards!

The Centre for Doctoral Studies introduced a new Research Mentoring and Support Excellence award to recognise all the non-supervisory members of staff who make important contributions to Postgraduate Researchers’ (PGR) success and support the approximately 4,500 PGR students that are registered at King’s.

We received over forty nominations for the three Research Mentoring and Support awards and the three winners showcased the best of the wider mentoring and support that staff provide to enable King’s postgraduate researchers to succeed.

The winners are:

Dr Melissa Washington-Nortey, Postdoctoral Project Manager, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience

A profile picture of Dr Melissa Washington-Nortey

Dr Melissa Washington-Nortey

‘Melissa is a huge help to me when I’m conducting my systematic review. She attended my meeting with supervisors to discuss the systematic review, during which she shared her knowledge of social support and parenting from a cultural perspective, assisted me in clarifying the review questions and built the framework for meta-synthesis.’

‘Melissa is postdoctoral project manager of the NIHR-funded SPARK project that aims to improve the mental health and wellbeing of children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Ethiopia and Kenya. SPARK supports four postdocs and five PhD students; two PhD students are affiliated to KCL. Since taking up the role of SPARK training lead Melissa has gone far beyond what would be expected to support the training of PGRs affiliated to SPARK. She organised a training survey to identify training needs, which suggested the main training gaps centred around qualitative research skills and expertise on clinical trials. In response she organised first an online qualitative research training course, attended by all SPARK trainees, including the two SPARK KCL PhD students as well as a third KCL PhD student.’

‘Since she has joined the lab, she has worked hard to support lab members, especially PGR students, in ways that go above and beyond her responsibilities as a project manager in a burdensome large international project (SPARK) of which some of us PGR students in the lab are not even part of.’

A profile picture of Dr Deborah Robson

Dr Deborah Robson

 

Dr Deborah Robson, Senior Lecturer, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience

‘Dr Robson – Debbie – is a beacon of mentorship and support. In academia, excellence in mentorship and support often remains unsung, however, without this, the traditionally celebrated measures in academia (robust researchers and teams, high-quality publications, high-value grants) would not be realised. My nomination for Debbie includes case studies of Debbie’s support of several PhD and Master’s students which outline the ways in which Debbie has provided crucial academic guidance; personal mentoring to increase these students’ self-confidence and career ambitions; and a listening ear when they were feeling excluded from the King’s community. Innovative supervisory practice often eludes definition, but in Debbie’s case, this is reflected in her accessibility and the inviting atmosphere of her office. Debbie’s impact extends far beyond the students and colleagues whom she supervises in a formal capacity. Debbie’s consistent commitment to pastoral care and fostering personal and professional growth deserves recognition.’

 

Sharwari Verma, Senior Research Technician, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine

A profile picture of Sharwari Verma

Sharwari Verma

‘Sharwari is a senior research technician in the lab I am conducting my PhD in. She was not directly involved with any of my work but still spent many days throughout the year to train me on certain techniques, help with trouble shooting, answer my many questions and she was always there for emotional support. She goes above and beyond to help others and I cannot imagine another individual that deserves this prize more than her.’

‘As a lab technician, Sharwari has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to creating a supportive and inclusive environment for students. She has gone above and beyond her duties to provide not only technical guidance but also personal support, offering a listening ear and practical advice to those facing personal or professional challenges.’

Congratulations to all our winners and nominees, it’s a great achievement, thank you for all the support you give to our PGRs at King’s College London.

« Older posts