Dr Jennifer Altehenger and Dr Sun Qing have organised a groundbreaking collaborative workshop which will be taking place at King’s College London next week. King’s History Department will welcome a delegation from the Department of History, Fudan University (Shanghai) on 22 and 23 May 2017 for the first joint workshop on “The City in History: global connections and comparisons”. With both King’s and Fudan situated at the heart of two of the world’s global metropolises – London and Shanghai – the city is a central theme of research and teaching at both institutions. Our staff and students explore the history of the city and history through the lens of the city from ancient to modern times, linking local and global perspectives. This workshop is a first opportunity for historians of both universities to meet and explore these common themes in our research, from public history to historical geography, political, economic, social, and cultural history, and the history of science, technology and medicine.
The full programme can be accessed below.
This workshop continues KCL History’s strong culture of research into, and teaching of, metropolitan history, some of which has been displayed on this blog in recent months. For example, student Charlotte Taylor wrote a fascinating review of a trip to the Black Cultural Archives in Brixton as part of the module Society and Culture in Twentieth Century London. Dr Tim Livsey also described a collaborative project about a south London estate with a particularly rich history and links to the famous diarist Samuel Pepys. And in April last year, staff and students walked a grand total of 13.8 miles, taking in 26 historic sites throughout London (all for an excellent cause). The event was given a wonderful write-up for our blog by Elle Larsson (PhD candidate).
For more information on the workshop, or if you wish to join, please contact:
Dr Jennifer Altehenger: firstname.lastname@example.org
Location: S8.08 Level 8 Strand Building
When: 22nd (09:00) – 23rd (18:00) of May 2017
Organisers: Dr Jennifer ALTEHENGER and Dr SUN Qing
|Monday, 22.5.10:00 – 10:30|| Welcome and Introductions
Prof Abigail WOODS, Prof HUANG Yang (via Skype), Prof GAO Xi
|10:30 – 12:00||Professor WU Jingping 吴景平《英商银行与上海金融变迁》
British banks and the transformation of Shanghai’s finance world
Professor Richard DRAYTON
The cities of north-west Europe and the making of Europe’s empires, c. 1500-1800
Professor Arthur BURNS
Identifying the challenge of the city to religion: Changing views of ‘town’ among religious professionals in Britain, 1700-1900
Chair: Dr Bérénice GUYOT-RECHARD
|12:00 – 13:00||Sandwich Lunch|
|13:00 – 14:30||Professor ZOU Zhenhuang 邹振环《近代上海的石库门与里弄文化》
Modern Shanghai Shikumen Building and Lane Culture
Professor YAO Dali 姚大力
The shift to modern forms in Chinese cities: the disintegration of the „housing compound“
Professor DONG Guoqiang 董国强
The Army in Xuzhou’s Factional Warfare,1967-1969
Chair: Dr Daniel MATLIN
|14:30 – 15:00||Coffee & Tea|
|15:00 – 16:30||Dr ZHU Lianbi 朱联璧The London Aerated Bread Company and the Industrialization of Bread-making, 1860-1930s
Professor David EDGERTON
The Port of London in Twentieth-Century British History
Dr Adam SUTCLIFFE
The Trader-Stranger and the Modern City: Georg Simmel in Global Context
Chair: Dr Jon WILSON
|Tuesday, 23.5.10:30 – 12:00||Dr Rory NAISMITH
Lundenwic to Lundenburh? The Londons of the Ninth Century
Professor ZHANG Haiying 张海英
Towards modernity: Shanghai in the early modern times
Dr Dennis STATHAKOPOULOS
Constantinople in the 1400s: Venice on the Bosphorus
Chair: Professor Hugh BOWDEN
|12:00 – 13:00||Sandwich lunch|
|13:00 – 14:30||Professor GAO Xi 高晞Health Morality and Hygiene in the mid-19th Century Shanghai
Professor Abigail WOODS
Sick cows and the city: London 1865-7 (and Shanghai, 1869-71)
Chair: Dr Jennifer ALTEHENGER
|14:30 – 15:00||Coffee & Tea|
|15:00 – 16:30||Assoc. Professor SUN Qing 孙青To view the magic images from mirror (jingying镜影)——the early experiences of slides as urban residents
Dr Laura CARTER
London County Council cultural and educational policy, 1918-1939
Dr Alana HARRIS
Patron Saint of Catholics and Hindus: St Antony and Diasporic devotions in East London
Chair: Dr Vincent HIRIBARREN
|16:30 – 18:00||Final discussion & future plans|
|18:00 – 19:00||Drinks|
Exciting new developments are taking place at KCL in the field of Contemporary British History. Read this blog post to find out more and click here to visit the CFP for the upcoming conference.
Historians at King’s are part of an exciting new venture in Contemporary British History, which will help to refashion Britain’s national story. King’s Contemporary British History (KCBH) is a cross-departmental and cross-Faculty research initiative, which brings together existing expertise in twentieth-century British history from across the university. It draws together the extraordinary strengths in the subject found mainly in the departments of History, War Studies, Defence Studies, Political Economy and English. King’s has around fifty scholars contemporary British history.
The centre’s goal is to develop a flexible and dynamic way of analyzing contemporary British society that will have genuine public relevance both at a policy and popular level. In this, historical argument and understanding has been, and will continue to be central. The Brexit vote was a clear example of how very particular historical images of the nation in the world were mobilised. King’s Contemporary British History will help refashion British national history by bringing together historical work of many different kinds.
King’s has a uniquely diverse wealth of existing expertise across various domains in the study of contemporary Britain. Our strengths include military history, science, technology, and medicine, heritage studies, imperial history, politics, religion, and gender studies. KCBH will make these great strengths visible, and support and develop new research initiatives and postgraduate training in all aspects of modern and contemporary British history. KCBH works with other initiatives that connect to the public and public institutions such as History & Policy, Historians in Residence, and the Strand Group.
The study of Contemporary British History in London goes back to the 1960s, and was consolidated with the establishment of the Institute of Contemporary British History in 1985 by (Sir) Anthony Seldon and (Lord) Peter Hennessy. The Institute moved to King’s College London in 2010. King’s Contemporary British History builds on this distinguished tradition by creating a larger and more diverse enterprise.
The centre has recently been awarded funding from the ‘King’s Together’ scheme allowing us to run workshops (for King’s staff). It will hold a ‘launch’ conference in September 2017, and much else besides. Over the coming weeks we will be launching a new website, so look out for that. For now, you can follow KCBH on Twitter @KingsCBH and Facebook. We are also in the process of creating an internal mailing list to keep people abreast of our work and developments. If you would like to be added to this mailing list, or would like more information on being involved in KCBH, please email: email@example.com.
Gabriella Infante, PhD Candidate in the Department of English at KCL, recounts an evening of education and entertainment in which the early modern tavern was brought to life as part of King’s Arts & Humanities’ Festival ‘Play’.
Playing cards, ballads’ sheets, wine and beer on tables in a candlelit room welcomed the audience of ‘At Play in the Early Modern Tavern’ last 12th October at Tutu’s. As part of King’s Arts & Humanities’ Festival ‘Play’, the Centre for Early Modern Studies organised an event celebrating the several meanings of ‘play’ in the world of the early modern tavern.
On this occasion, it seemed apt to emphasise the hedonistic features of taverns, such as drinking, courting, and gambling. The three main segments of the event were aimed at celebrating carpe diem over nefarious consequences of extreme drinking, and planned to avoid cautionary tales, by providing a window on the dynamics originating in playful early modern taverns. Drinking and drinking places hold an exceptional place in the cultural identity of England, and it is the early modern age which defined socio-political differences between alehouses, taverns, and inns. Taverns became to assume specific features from the 1550s to the end of the seventeenth century – the period in which the songs, documents, and play performed for this event were produced.
Dr. Emily Butterworth, Lecturer in the French Department and co-director of CEMS, effectively introduced the audience to the diverse world of early modern habits of drinking, by also indicating the timeframe and the social implications linked to each type of drinking place. For her section of the event, students from King’s Music department Matthew O’ Keeffe, William Hester, and Alex Prately performed Jean Richafort’s Trut avant il faut boire, a chanson which describes and enacts the good fellowship of drinking, also reprised in the final section of the event, and insists on the importance of seizing the moment of enjoyment and fun in life car après que serons morts – because we will be dead after anyway.
As a song thought for three trained singers, and therefore created for, and more suitable to, a tavern or an inn, this was different from the second section of the event, planned by Professor Laura Gowing, department of History. King’s former MA students Charlotte Fletcher and Emma Harris and current PhD students Michelle Barnette and Molly Corlett re-enacted bits of defamation cases held in the records of the Consistory Court of London spanning the years 1572-1725. Famous and infamous locations across London, such as the Sun Tavern in St. Martin in the Fields or the Greyhounde Tavern in Soho Fields, were the set of rough verbal exchanges between citizens attending these places. The audience could enjoy a realistic peek into the dynamics of a promiscuous early modern alehouse, where excessive drinking and carefree pursuit of sexual pleasure combined to create dangerous, and illegal, situations.
As a break before the longest and final section of the evening, the ballad Good Ale for my Money and the song Martin said to his Man delighted the audience, particularly eager to read the lyrics and sing along, and to follow the three singers in a further invitation to drink and be merry.
The event ended with excerpts from the play The Walks of Islington and Hogsdon, with the Humours of Woodstreet Compter, by Thomas Jordan. This section was organised by Dr. Lucy Munro and me, both from the department of English, with the invaluable help of director James Wallace. First performed on the stage of the Red Bull in 1641, and then published in 1657, this comedy was also re-thought for the Restoration audience and King Charles II in the 1660s. The scenes selected presented an appealing cohort of gallants, attempting to juggle unhappy marriages, lovers, pregnant whores in taverns of Islington –background to many of their mischiefs. The play, like Laura Gowing’s section, was carefully chosen to convey topographical familiarity and to elicit participation by stressing the relevance of locations for the early modern drinking space.
The purpose of the event was to offer entertainment to a modern audience through accurate re-enactments of early modern life episodes in relation to drinking customs in England. The event managed to convey the importance of taverns as social, as well as political, places of cultural exchange, but its main aim was to explore the meanings of ‘play’ to the early modern mind. And what better way to do that, than in a place where every type of play, from cards to transvestitism, took place? Nunc est bibendum. Now is the time for drinking.
Elle Larsson (PhD Candidate, KCL) walks us through the King’s History Monuments Marathon; a great day out for an even better cause. The text and images were originally posted by Elle on ISpyHistory.
For the past month or so you may have seen me posting links to the crowdfunding page for an event King’s History Department runs biennially – the Monuments Marathon and Parks & Palaces Plod. The ‘Marathon’ was set up in 2014 by former KCL Professor Ludmilla Jordanova in order to raise funds for the Undergraduate Hardship fund, although this years’ sponsorship was for the equivalent MA fund. The idea as pitched to us was to take to the ‘streets and parks of London to tour sites of historical interest, learning from each other’ along the way.
Hearing that, I should think it will come as no surprise to hear that when we received an email advertising the event back in April, I was immediately on board with the idea – fundraising while learning about history and walking around London – what was not to love! The plan was to walk to 26 historic sites over the distance of around 10 miles, the walk starting at King’s and featuring 4 minute ‘street talks’ from volunteers choosing to speak on sites of their choice along the route.
And that is exactly what we did last Sunday. We walked a grand total of around 13.8 miles, taking in 26 historic sites over the course of around 10 hours. I should say at this point however that 4 members of the department put in an extra tremendous effort, rising early and running an 11.5 mile route taking in the palaces of London – beginning with the Tower of London and ending with Kensington Palace, before heading back to KCL and joining the rest of us on the walk!
It was a really fantastic day – we had good weather, great company and were able to share some of the lesser known stories of London we’ve each come across during the course of our own research. A huge range of topics were covered and what struck me in particular was that even though some of these places are signified by plaques and statues, the stories are much richer than can be conveyed by those markers alone, while others simply had no markers at all.
A few things from the day have stuck out in particular. For example the origin of the legend of the ‘Black Dog’ of Newgate and how beneath Trafalgar Square there was/is a rich source of prehistoric archaeological material, including Mammoths; the fact that beneath Benjamin Franklin’s house a large number of human skeletons had been excavated, owing to the fact that another of its former residents had been a comparative anatomist, who himself died after contracting sepsis from one of his cadavers! But I think my favourite snippet has to be hearing about the mechanized waxwork of Mrs. Salmon which was booby-trapped to kick patrons as they left her establishment. Who new early nineteenth century waxworks could be mechanized?
These stand out for me but each talk was incredibly interesting and below I’ve put the entire list of places we visited and topics covered by our talks to give you an idea of the history that is out there and sites that you may have previously walked passed having never realized their significance. It was truly a case of Ispyhistory at its best and it’s safe to say that in two years’ time, when this event comes round again, my feet better be ready for a repeat performance!
- Lady Somerset and the Temperance Child, Victoria Embankment Gardens (Statue).
- Benjamin Franklin House, 36 Craven Street, (Plaque).
- Mammoths in the Square, Trafalgar Square.
- The Strand Menagerie, 372 Strand, (Building).
- Mrs Salmon’s Waxworks, 17 Fleet Street, (Building).
- Picasso in London, 51 Floral Street (Plaque).
- The Slayer of Soho: John Snow’s Pump, 39 Broadwick Street.
- Banking Natural History, 32 Soho Square (Plaque).
- Penning the Vindication, Store Street.
- Fitzrovia Revolutionaries, Fitzroy Square (Statue).
- Camden Pan-Africanism, 22 Cranleigh Street (Plaque).
- South African Freedom Fighters, 13 Lyme Street (Plaque).
- Gandhi’s London, Tavistock Square (Statue).
- Emmeline Pankhurst’s House, 8 Russell Square, (Building).
- Literary Lights and Colonial Students, Mecklenburgh Square.
- Anti-Suffragism and Settlement Houses, 42 Queen Square, (Building).
- The Women’s Freedom League, 144 High Holborn, (Building).
- Meating One’s Maker, Smithfield Market.
- ‘The Black Dog of Newgate’, Warwick Lane.
- Indigenous Transnationals at St Paul’s, (Building).
- Rude Deeds on Rood Lane, Rood Lane, (Building).
- Tower Hill Memorial, Trinity Square Gardens, (Memorial).
- The Falklands Memorial, Trinity Square Gardens, (Memorial).
- Altab Ali Park, Adler Street, (Memorial).
- Responding to the Ripper, 14 Cannon Street Road, (Exhibition).
- Execution Dock, 57 Wapping Wall.
It will come as a little surprise that after a grand total of 13.8 miles well-earned celebratory drinks and a sit down were then had at the prospect of Whitby Pub!
Historians of King’s College London debated the referendum on Wednesday, June 8, 2016, 4:30-6:00 PM.
In the run-up to the referendum on Britain’s continued membership in the European Union, there has been no shortage of public debate about the possible consequences of the vote, including many forums sponsored by London’s universities. The History Department at King’s wanted to make its own distinctive contribution to these discussions, playing to the strengths of the discipline. The head of department, Adam Sutcliffe, therefore asked two colleagues, Jim Bjork and Anne Goldgar, to take the lead in organizing a forum that would take a step back from the immediate In/Out question and provide some broader and deeper context. Under the title ‘Visions of Europe and the Brexit debate’, four historians were asked to discuss how understandings of Europe have evolved over time: What ostensibly held Europe together? What have been seen as Europe’s outer limits? Two of the speakers (Richard Vinen and Jim Bjork) work primarily on the twentieth century, while the other two (Serena Ferente and Toby Green), as well as the chair, Anne Goldgar, specialize in earlier periods (late medieval to early modern).
A common theme of all of the talks was mutability in understandings of Europe and attitudes toward Europe. The first speaker, Richard Vinen, focused on the evolution of British politicians’ views of European integration since the Second World War. He noted that enthusiasm for British engagement in this project tended to be stronger on the Right than on the Left at the time of Britain’s accession to the European Economic Community in the 1970s, but then, as now, the attitudes of many individual politicians shifted with changing circumstances. The next talk, by Serena Ferente, turned to the very different context of continental Europe in the fifteenth century. She described how one familiar way of defining Europe—as a community united by Christianity—was consciously promoted by Pope Pius II in response to a contemporary challenge from the Ottoman Turks. Dr. Ferente argued that such programmatic definitions should be seen as attempts to impose order on the continent’s underlying cultural and political pluralism and its frequent demographic disruptions, then, as now, manifested in flows of refugees from conflict zones. Toby Green’s contribution also highlighted the historical contingency of definitions of Europe, in particular in relation to Africa. Connections between Iberia and North Africa had been especially strong in the late medieval period, blurring the distinction between the two continents. And in the twentieth century, attempts to disentangle (European) metropole and (African) colony in the process of de-colonization had also generated much debate and ambivalence. Many residents of Cape Verde, for example, sought to remain part of Portugal and thus, by extension, part of Europe. In the final set of remarks, Jim Bjork argued that uncertainty about Europe’s frontiers was paralleled by uncertainty about the continent’s centre. Early and late modern commentators had noted the paradox of Europe’s geographic centre being marked by a sense of helplessness in the face of bids for hegemony arising on the continent’s margins (Spain, France, Britain, Russia). This had given rise to rival twentieth-century visions of ‘Central Europe’ as either serving as the core of a robust new imperial power or, alternately, as modelling pluralistic co-existence among small nations, suggesting very different visions for the potential organization of the continent as a whole.
The initial presentations were followed by a half hour of questions and comments from the audience, composed of about 25 members of academic staff, postgraduate and undergraduate students. In addition to following up on particular points made by individual speakers, several interventions from the audience understandably circled back to the issue of what implications these broader historical perspectives might have for the upcoming referendum. It seemed fair to say that all speakers were sceptical of the view, advanced by at least some advocates of Britain’s exit from the EU, that the long-term histories of Britain and continental Europe ran on separate or divergent tracks. The diversity and mutability of historical visions of Europe meant that there was no fundamental incompatibility with various visions of Britain. But it was noted that the panel’s recurring references to contingency and flux in Europe’s past did also help to explain a widespread sense of uncertainty and anxiety about Europe’s possible futures.