{"id":2174,"date":"2025-06-05T15:30:28","date_gmt":"2025-06-05T15:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/?p=2174"},"modified":"2025-06-05T15:30:28","modified_gmt":"2025-06-05T15:30:28","slug":"applied-science-how-joseph-banks-science-fuelled-empire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/2025\/06\/05\/applied-science-how-joseph-banks-science-fuelled-empire\/","title":{"rendered":"Applied science: How Joseph Banks\u2019 science fuelled empire"},"content":{"rendered":"

This post is written by and posted on behalf of Eleanor Smith, who undertook an internship in the\u00a0Foyle Special Collections Library<\/a>, as part of her MA History course at King\u2019s College London. The internship ran from January to April 2025.<\/p>\n

\"Photograph<\/a>The focus of Eleanor\u2019s research was the life of naturalist Joseph Banks (1743-1820), a natural philosopher during the Enlightenment. Long-standing president of the Royal Society and the first botanist to travel with a British naval ship, Banks was a profoundly influential figure. Through his life’s work, most notably his discoveries aboard James Cook\u2019s HMS Endeavour,<\/em> he had a lasting impact on British science.<\/p>\n

Banks\u2019 contributions to anthropology, zoology and botany enhanced scientific knowledge and helped to cement colonial power during the 18th and 19th centuries. Enlightenment ideals meant that applied science, science with an explicit goal and purpose, was seen as the only real science of value, and whether intentionally or not, Banks contributed to empire-building in some way through each new discovery. While Banks is often celebrated for his role in advancing botanical knowledge and global scientific exchange, his work is also deeply entangled within the structures and legacies of colonialism, including the dispossession of Indigenous lands and peoples.<\/p>\n

Eleanor delivered a presentation on this work at Shoe Lane Library in London on Friday 2 May 2025; and her research is available to view as an interactive ArcGIS StoryMaps post<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A Voyage of Discovery<\/strong><\/h4>\n
\"Title<\/a>
Title page of John Hawkesworth’s An account of the voyages…1773<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Had you attended the Foyle Special Collections Library exhibition for 2025, From Streets to the Stars: 500 Years of Maps<\/em>, you would have found an item in Case 4,\u00a0Uncharted Waters<\/em>, published by John Hawkesworth, English writer and editor. He had been tasked with chronicling the voyages of three ships, the Dolphin<\/em>, the Swallow<\/em> and the Endeavour<\/em>, each commissioned by King George III between 1768 and 1771. The vessel of most significant interest to me was the Endeavour because it was one of the first British naval ships to have scientists conducting research aboard. Joseph Banks conducted botanical, zoological and anthropological research throughout the voyage to the South Seas. His research practices are noted in Hawkesworth\u2019s writings and in Cook\u2019s journal of the voyage, a copy of which is also held in the Foyle Special Collections Library.<\/p>\n

Captained by then-Lieutenant James Cook, the HMS Endeavour<\/em> had been sent to track the transit of Venus in the southern hemisphere. The observation of this astronomical event was intended to verify the distance between the Earth and the Sun and improve calculations of longitude, which was a difficult thing to measure accurately at the time. Cook, however, had been issued with a secret, secondary mission, to navigate, map and claim Terra Australis Incognita for England.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Science, Wealth and Ambition<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Over the course of his life, Joseph Banks was a profoundly influential figure in the field of scientific exploration but also across many other aspects of British imperialism. Banks was incredibly wealthy and was able to secure his place, and those of his retinue, aboard the Endeavour <\/em>through the generous donation of \u00a310,000, over a hundred times the yearly wage of its captain. Banks hand-picked a trusted team of eight to join him, including the Swedish naturalist Daniel Solander, the Finnish naturalist Herman Sp\u00f6ring, artists Sydney Parkinson and Alexander Buchan, and four servants from his estate.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>
A map from John Hawkesworth’s An account of the voyages…1773<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

During the voyage Banks was obviously passionate about his work, almost to a fault. Cook noted in his journal that during their first stop in Rio de Janeiro, the crew were not allowed to dock in the harbour due to political tensions between Britain and Portugal. Despite the risk, Banks and Solander sneaked onto land and indiscriminately collected shrubs and plants to study aboard the ship. Other sources claim that Banks and Solander abseiled down the side of the Endeavour<\/em> in the dead of night without Cook\u2019s knowledge, showing Banks\u2019 clear devotion to science above all else. This was not the only time Banks would skirt the rules for his research, and in this instance, had he and Solander been caught, they might have caused a major international incident between the British and Portuguese governments.<\/p>\n

Encounters and Consequences<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Throughout the voyage, Banks and Solander would collect and document a wide variety of both plants and animals but also took time to carefully collect information on the languages and customs of local indigenous peoples. If the perspectives of Cook and Banks are to be believed, then their interactions with most local tribes were pleasant ones.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
An engraved illustration of Tahiti from Hawkesworth’s account<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

During their stay in Tahiti, for instance, Banks requested that Tupaia, a wise man of the village, and his son be allowed to join the crew and return with him in England. Banks was initially denied this request, and it is in his response that we can see one of the more obvious example of Banks’ colonial ideals. Banks was incensed that he was not allowed to \u2018keep\u2019 these two men, comparing their staying with him in his house in England to other Englishmen being allowed to keep exotic pets. This obvious disregard for the humanity of indigenous peoples was an indicator that he put science and his own desires over everything, including the autonomy of indigenous peoples. Due to Banks\u2019 vast wealth and influence however, he was eventually allowed to take these two men aboard the ship.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
The HMS Endeavour moored in a sheltered bay as repairs are made and supplies are gathered<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As their journey continued, there interactions with native peoples turned violent. Within half a day of landing in Aotearoa (New Zealand), one of the local M\u0101ori people had been shot. This conflict led to Cook capturing two M\u0101ori warriors, plying them with gifts in an attempt at reparation that was reluctantly received. Following this, Cook navigated and mapped New Zealand extensively, with Banks and Solander documenting everything they saw along the way.<\/p>\n

Their second mission was complete once they arrived in Australia, or as it was known then, New Holland, where Cook claimed Botany Bay for England, despite the Eora people having already inhabited that region of Australia for thousands of years. Botany Bay was so named for the extensive number of specimens Banks and Solander were able to document on its shores.<\/p>\n

On their way back to England, the Endeavour stopped in Batavia (present-day Jakarta) for repairs and supplies. A decision that they quickly regretted. The town was rife with illness, and many of the crew succumbed, including Parkinson, Sporing, Tupaia and his son. They were all buried at sea.<\/p>\n

Despite this sad end to their journey and their inability to track the transit of Venus in Tahiti due to poor weather conditions, the Endeavour voyage was still considered an overall success. They had claimed land in Australia, and Banks and Solander had collected over 1,000 plant specimens. Cook went on to become a famous captain, and Banks and Solander were thrust to the top of London’s scientific society.<\/p>\n

Science in the Service of Empire<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The secondary literature on Banks is vast, as he has become a staple in popular history. Although he was influential in many areas of science, his contribution to colonialism is also extensive, and many of his scientific practices would come under scrutiny today. His habit of planting European seeds in every country that the Endeavour<\/em> docked in, for instance, could have led to the spread of invasive species, although, to my knowledge, this was not the case. However, it has been widely<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
A breadfruit from Tahiti. Banks supported it’s propagation on British plantations in the Caribbean as a food source for enslaved peoples<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

documented that introducing non-native plants can upset the delicate balance of a native ecosystem.<\/p>\n

By reflecting in this way, we are viewing his life through a modern lens and holding his actions to current standards, when the science of this era had always been an applied science, science with a purpose. Some may say that men like Banks perhaps only contributed to the Empire because that was the only thing that they could do at that time. They may posit that had Banks lived now, he would likely have contributed greatly to a modern Britain, and so his output would not have been so focused on furthering colonialism.<\/p>\n

This argument, however, is completely reductive, as Banks was not only contributing to the empire indirectly through his science but was directly involved in furthering colonial aims in New South Wales, Australia. Later in Banks\u2019 life, he would become a direct proponent of this imperial system by petitioning the House of Commons to make Botany Bay a new penal colony, contributing to the displacement and targeted eradication of Aboriginal tribes already living in New South Wales.<\/p>\n

Banks had no respect for the humanity of indigenous peoples, clearly seen in the way he spoke of Tupaia and his son as being equivalent to exotic pets. Cook, on the other hand, a figure who is often the target of anti-colonial sentiment, shows a certain, albeit ill-informed, level of respect that is not seen in Banks’ work. He notes that although he may not \u201cunderstand how people can live on a land without knowing its worth or monetary value, these indigenous peoples seem to be happier than Europeans\u201d. While Banks and Solander would ask questions of the wise men in each village and take copious notes on local legends and customs, these were purely scientific studies and not indicative of a genuine respect for native cultures. Banks’ disregard for the lives of indigenous peoples is also evidenced by the fact that on every ship that left New South Wales and returned to England, numerous specimens were taken on board for Banks\u2019 growing collections. One of these shipments appallingly and unconscionably included the severed head of Pemulwuy, a Bidjigal warrior of the Dharug people and a leader of resistance against British colonisation in the area around modern-day Sydney. Australian indigenous communities have made several requests for the repatriation of the skull and while there are an estimated 3,000 records of indigenous remains in the UK, Pemulwuy’s skull has not yet been found among them.<\/p>\n

Behind the Written History<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Within European history, Banks is seen as a great man of science, and he was, but the devastating effect he has had on the indigenous groups in the South Pacific must also be acknowledged. Throughout my research into this topic, I have found several articles on Banks, all mentioning his great contribution to science, with his many colonial practices taking a back seat. That is not to say that they weren\u2019t mentioned, as most of the articles and blogs I looked at included notes on Banks working in the South Seas, but to truly understand the impact Banks had, we must listen to the perspectives of the people most affected.<\/p>\n

Please find links below to blogs, articles and websites written by or with input from indigenous groups across Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand. I would greatly encourage all who read this blog to consider history from all perspectives, as those with influence, like Joseph Banks, have made both great and terrible contributions in equal measure, and the record of history is never an equal, or even-handed one.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

\u2018They are all dead\u2019: for Indigenous people, Cook\u2019s voyage of \u2018discovery\u2019 was a ghostly\u00a0visitation, The Conversation, \u00a0https:\/\/theconversation.com\/they-are-<\/a>all-dead-for-indigenous-people-cooks-voyage-of-discovery-was-a-ghostly-<\/a>visitation-126430\u00a0<\/a>\u200b<\/p>\n

Reopening and reinterpretation \u2013 our Front Hall busts, British Library, \u00a0https:\/\/blogs.bl.uk\/living-knowledge\/2020\/08\/index.html\u00a0<\/a>\u200b<\/p>\n

First Contact, Barani, \u00a0https:\/\/www.sydneybarani.com.au\/sites\/first-contact\/\u00a0<\/a>\u200b<\/p>\n

First Nations perspectives on Cook, The National Library of Australia, \u00a0https:\/\/www.library.gov.au\/learn\/digital-classroom\/legend-and-<\/a>legacy-james-cook\/first-nations-perspectives-cook\u00a0<\/a>\u200b<\/p>\n

State Library NSW, Governor Arthur’s Proclamation to the Aborigines | <\/a>State Library of New South Wales<\/a>\u200b<\/p>\n

State Library NSW, Eora – Mapping Aboriginal Sydney 1770-1850<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/h4>\n

Select Bibliography<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Primary Sources<\/h5>\n

John Hawkesworth. An account of the voyages undertaken by the order of His present Majesty for making discoveries in the Southern Hemisphere<\/em>. London: W Strahan and T Cadell, 1773. [FCDO Historical Collection]; FOL. G420 HAW<\/p>\n

Richard Orton, et al. A Journal of a Voyage Round the World, in His Majesty\u2019s Ship Endeavour in the years 1768, 1769, 1770 and 1771.<\/em> London: printed for T. Becket and P.A. De Hondt, in the Strand, 1771. [FCDO Historical Collection];\u00a0FOL. G420.C7 JOU<\/p>\n

Secondary Sources<\/h5>\n

Kerry Lotzof. \u2018Joseph Banks: Scientist, Explorer and Botanist,\u2019 www.nhm.ac.uk, n.d., https:\/\/www.nhm.ac.uk\/discover\/joseph<\/a>–<\/a>banks<\/a>–<\/a>scientist<\/a>–<\/a>explorer<\/a>–<\/a>botanist.html<\/a>.<\/a><\/p>\n

Maureen Lazarus & Heather Pardoe. \u2018Naturalists on the Endeavour Voyage (1768\u20131771): Personalities, Pursuits, and Problems\u2019.\u00a0Collections<\/em>,\u00a018<\/em>(2), 236-257, (2022).\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15501906221079223<\/a><\/p>\n

Simone La Corbiniere. \u2018The Dark Side of Botany: How the Myth of the Harmless Botanist Conceals Colonial Realities,\u2019 Brighton & Hove Museums, n.d., <\/a>https:\/\/brightonmuseums.org.uk\/discovery\/history<\/a>stories\/the<\/a>–<\/a>dark<\/a>–<\/a>side<\/a>–<\/a>of<\/a>–<\/a>botany<\/a>–<\/a>how<\/a>–<\/a>the<\/a>–<\/a>myth<\/a>–<\/a>of<\/a>–<\/a>the<\/a>–<\/a>harmless<\/a>–<\/a>botanist<\/a>–<\/a>conceals<\/a>–<\/a>colonial<\/a>–<\/a>realities\/<\/a>.<\/a><\/p>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This post is written by and posted on behalf of Eleanor Smith, who undertook an internship in the\u00a0Foyle Special Collections Library, as part of her MA History course at King\u2019s College London. The internship ran from January to April 2025. The focus of Eleanor\u2019s research was the life of naturalist Joseph Banks (1743-1820), a natural … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Applied science: How Joseph Banks\u2019 science fuelled empire”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":969,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[251,261,239,250],"tags":[415,410,417,328,336,413,416,305,392,333,334,409,414,411,412],"class_list":["post-2174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-empirecommonwealth","category-foreign-and-commonwealth-historical-library-collection","category-fscl","category-history-of-science","tag-aotearoa-new-zealand","tag-applied-science","tag-captain-james-cook","tag-colonisation","tag-cultural-heritage","tag-description-and-travel","tag-first-nations-peoples","tag-foyle-special-collections-library","tag-history-of-australia","tag-human-rights","tag-indigenous-culture","tag-joseph-banks","tag-tahiti","tag-transit-of-venus","tag-voyage-of-discovery","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/969"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2174"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2200,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2174\/revisions\/2200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kcl.ac.uk\/kingscollections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}